A complicated song weird al music video series#

The remote connection of the Gorillaz feels especially appropriate now. The best Song Machine “episode” so far remains “ Désolé,” with the excellent singer-actress Fatoumata Diawara leading a minor-key burn that, like Albarn’s best songs, has a calculated off-ness that hits in waves. Like most Gorillaz albums, Song Machine is interesting as a whole yet more enjoyable as a collection of moments Blur remains Albarn’s go-to vehicle for making more straightforward albums. “I’m a kind of pop Nostradamus,” he laughs. Albarn, who understands how numbing and bland history can feel, is most proud of this foresight.

A complicated song weird al music video series#

That he would stretch out the next Gorillaz album across several months as a singles series called Song Machine, in which every song pairs Albarn with what feels like a speed dial of his very famous friends - (Peter Hook dusting off his New Order bass on “Aries” Skepta and Tony Allen, who sadly passed away this past April, dueling on “How Far?” Elton John toning down the glitter on “The Pink Phantom” with 6LACK) - is a testament to his ability to read the room and reflect pop’s mood, even if it’s not what we want to hear. After all, Albarn is a melancholy - and adaptable - pop-music wizard who works best in bleak times. Parody pokes fun at the original work and is protected by fair use, while satire uses the original work to poke fun at something else, and is not protected.“In a sense, Gorillaz is what I would have been if I hadn’t been in Blur.”ĭamon Albarn probably didn’t anticipate the devastating global reach of COVID-19 when he once again revived Gorillaz in late January. But there's a difference between parody and satire. Someone has long since fallen on the sword: 2 Live Crew, in a suit decided by the Supreme Court, Campbell v. To cement in everyone's minds once and for all that parody is in fact protected under fair use, and to discourage IP holders from filing frivolous lawsuits in the hopes the accused will fold without a fight.

The way the system is set up right now, someone is gonna have to fall on the sword and eat the cost of defending a high-profile lawsuit for parody. (Just like musicians incorrectly think they're allowed to control what events their licensed music is played at.) Unfortunately, that seems to have given music publishers the wrong impression - that parody is illegal unless they first give permission. Just to avoid a long, messy, and expensive court battle to reiterate that he didn't need their permission to make parodies. So broken that when Weird Al Yankovich made his song parodies, even though he was protected by the fair use exception for parody, he proactively got permission from the original song owners first. 'Rhymes are chosen, and two neural networks, GPT-2 and XLNET, are then used to generate each line, word by word.' These alternative lyrics can then be sung to the original tune,' Riedl said. Yankovic generates alternative lyrics that match the rhyme and syllables schemes of existing songs. Riedl, whose research focuses on the study of artificial intelligence and storytelling for entertainment, says the model was created as a personal project and outside his role at Georgia Tech. Fair use also protects parody in some circumstances. The incident raises the question of what role machine learning plays when it comes to the already nuanced and complicated rules of fair use, which allows for the use of a copyrighted work in certain circumstances, including educational uses and as part of a 'transformative' work. Twitter also did not respond to Motherboard's request for comment. Riedl has contested the takedown with Twitter but has not received a response. Riedl said his other AI-generated lyric videos posted to Twitter have not been taken down. 'I am fairly convinced that my videos fall under fair use,' Riedl told Motherboard of his AI creation, which is obviously inspired by Weird Al's parodies. From a report: On May 15, Reidl posted an AI-generated lyric video featuring the instrumental to Michael Jackson's 'Beat It.' It was taken down on July 14, Reidl tweeted, after Twitter received a Digital Millennium Copyright Act takedown notice for copyright infringement from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, which represents major and independent record companies. Yankovic,' which generates new rhyming lyrics for existing songs would cause any trouble. Georgia Tech researcher Mark Riedl didn't expect that his machine learning model 'Weird A.I.